Scribblers, scribes, authors, and publishers – all of these are facing ever-worsening conditions in pursuing their work in battling the goons of secrecy and impunity. The Reporters Without Borders (RSF) World Press Freedom Index has rotten news on that score. For the first time since the index came into being, RSF states that “over half of the world’s countries now fall into the ‘difficult’ or ‘very serious’ categories for press freedom. In 25 years, the average score of all 180 countries and territories surveyed in the Index has never been so low.”
In reaching its scores on press freedom, RSF uses five contextual indicators: political context, legal framework, economic context, sociocultural context, and safety. The political context evaluates, among other things, the extent of support for and respect for media autonomy in the face of political pressure from the state or various political actors. Factors important to legal matters include the extent of censorship, judicial sanctions, and restrictions on freedom of expression. The economic dimension takes into account factors such as the difficulties of establishing news media outlets, the prevalence of corruption, the allocation of state subsidies, and the interests of media owners. The sociocultural context covers such issues as “denigration and attacks on the press based on such issues as gender, class, ethnicity, and religion” and cultural restraints against reporting. Safety focuses on journalists’ ability to identify, gather, and disseminate news without facing bodily harm, psychological or emotional distress, or professional harm.
The group has postulated various reasons for the precipitous decline in press freedoms. Armed conflict plays its inevitable, corrosive role. Iraq (ranked 162), Sudan, one spot above, and Yemen at 164 are cases in point. The ongoing battle between Israel and the Palestinians has been disastrous for press freedom, not least because of the killing, since October 2023, of over 220 journalists in Gaza by the Israeli Defense Forces. 70 of the slain were killed while carrying out their work.
The authoritarian regimes have done little to improve their standing on the index. China remains confidently oppressive of reporters at 178, with North Korea stoutly taking the spot below. Eritrea completes the bottom at 180. Russia, at 172, continues to blot its copybook in targeting journalists (as of April 2026, 48 remain in prison), a situation not helped by its ongoing war in Ukraine. The Iranian regime (177) maintains its studied viciousness against journalists. Saudi Arabia, despite its gaudy, kitschy efforts at modernization led by the petulant princeling Mohammed bin Salman, has not softened its stance on press freedom. On June 14 last year, the Saudi journalist Turki al-Jasser was executed after a seven-year spell of arbitrary imprisonment. Al-Jasser had been accused by the Saudi authorities of operating the X account named Kashkool, one inclined to post material linking the House of Saud with human rights abuses and corruption.
Of all the states recorded, Niger, at 120, registered the most dramatic fall (down 37 spots). This, according to RSF, underscored “the wider decline in press freedom in the Sahel region seen in recent years as attacks by armed groups and ruling juntas have suppressed the right to balanced information from diverse sources.”
The organization notes in despair that the Index’s legal indicator has registered a sharp decline in 2026. “This score deteriorated in more than 60% of states – 110 out of 180 – between 2025 and 2026.” Journalism has been systematically criminalized, a practice “rooted in circumventing press law and misusing emergency legislation and common law”.
Resorting to national security laws and regulations is a favorite. Mention terrorism as a charge, as happened to the journalist Frenchie Mae Cumpio, and a prosecution, however baseless, becomes elementary and successful. (In Cumpio’s case, the shoddy charge was that of financing terrorism.) In Türkiye, the net of national security is cast widely to include charges of “disinformation”, Article 299 of the country’s Penal Code covering insults to the President, and the charge of “denigrating state institutions”. States, in claiming to use the law appropriately, resort to strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs). RSF underlines Bulgaria (71) and Guatemala (128) as practitioners of the art. Not to be left out, political and business plutocrats make use of laws to curb exposure of their antics in the press. Indonesia (129), Singapore (123), and Thailand (92) are seen as experts in this regard.
Protections for journalists from legal or physical threats were also found to be woeful, with more than 80% of countries having “non-existent or ineffective” measures. Even the European Media Freedom Act (EMFA), seen as sound armor for the independence and sustainability of media outlets, has been weakened by domestic legislatures. Hungary (ranked 74), only recently rid of its long-serving Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, excelled in this regard, though RSF also notes the programs of such countries as Slovakia (37) and Lithuania (15).
To round up the inglorious list are the United States (64), Argentina (98), and El Salvador (143). US President Donald Trump continues to hound and harry the Fourth Estate, with RSF taking particular issue with cuts to the US Agency for Global Media (USAGM) responsible for the drastic slimming of personnel at the Voice of America (VOA), Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL), and Radio Free Asia (RFA).
Rankings, in themselves, are cold measures. They can also be vague. But there is nothing vague about the insatiable appetite towards persecution shown by states of all political persuasions when attacking reporters and publishers. The dictates of the national security state and its desperation to control narratives and hold the line on mendacity and the exposure of bad behavior remain the most threatening disease to the Fourth Estate.