The concepts that shaped the minds that eagerly approve of the genocide, buried in the Old Testament and in the history of independent Jewish governing, are targets for extinction, Zionist behavior today includes a messianic endeavor that complements the original political Zionism and aligns with behavior of Jews in ancient history. This is a significant change that demands revelation. Theodore Herzl’s incipient Zionism, promoted by secular Jews, brought havoc to the Middle East; the messianic attachment is creating havoc to the entire world.
No longer are Jews and their religion veiled from criticism; the protective shield of anti-Semitism has been lifted and slowly, quite slowly, the minds corrupted by inability to assimilate information guarded by the protective shield are gaining clearer thinking of the relations between Jews and their religion and the rest of the western world. The corrupted minds are not only non-Jewish minds; they are Jewish minds, molded together by doctrines that espouse a violent “eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth,” molded together by a deliberate implantation of insecurity and victim hood. The ultra- orthodox element, that has gained unusual power, ignores the teachings of math, science, English and other non-religious topics. Instead, it directs the faithful to a mind-bending religious study.
At Passover, Jews celebrate the mythical Exodus that glorifies the “killing of the first born” in Egypt, not an enviable rite in a peaceful oriented religion. The mythical and false history of an Exodus is presented as reality, of Jews emerging from slavery. That slavery whispers through 3000 years, breathing life in films, stories, novels, and song, making it seem that contemporary Jews today carry the memory of slavery in their souls as intense as that imposed upon the descendants of African slaves, and Jews, because of this memory, are the vanguard against injustice. The truth shall make you free.
Exodus 21:2-4
When you acquire a Hebrew slave, that person shall serve six years — and shall go free in the seventh year, without payment. If [a male slave] came single, he shall leave single; if he had a wife, his wife shall leave with him. If his master gave him a wife, and she bore him children, the wife and her children shall belong to the master, and he shall leave alone.
Leviticus 25:44-46
And as for your male and female slaves whom you may have—from the nations that are around you, from them you may buy male and female slaves. Moreover you may buy the children of the strangers who dwell among you, and their families who are with you, which they beget in your land; and they shall become your property. And you may take them as an inheritance for your children after you, to inherit them as a possession; they shall be your permanent slaves. But regarding your brethren, the children of Israel, you shall not rule over one another with rigor.
The strength and audacity imposed on contemporary Jewish thought by the fiction recited from the Torah appeared at a seminar in which former Israeli Prime Minister Simon Peres participated. Know him, the man who started the West Bank settlements and then tried to convince everyone he was party to a “two-state solution?” In answer to the question of “Why is Israel oppressing the Palestinians?” I personally heard the esteemed hypocrite respond, “Would we who were enslaved be guilty of enslaving others?” “We,” twentieth century individuals, probably no less attached to the Eskimos than those who roamed the Middle East three thousand years ago, who live much better than most on the planet, identifying themselves as carrying memory and shaped by a spurious servitude. Oh, by the way, Seňor Peres, “During the 1840s and 1850s, approximately a quarter of all Jewish households in America’s South owned slaves.”
From Exodus 23:31, the second book of the Torah, written by those who composed the Old Testament (the early Zionists) in the last centuries before Anno Dominini (A.D.), a self-serving and demented claim is made, an assertion that the faithful utter in the scientific, technologically advanced, and “we are all equal” 2ist century ─ Jews are the “Chosen People.”
For you are a people holy to the Lord your God. The Lord your God has chosen you to be a people for his treasured possession, out of all the peoples who are on the face of the earth.
Can it be that Zionists, most of whom are secular, believe the land that is now called Israel was given by a God to the Jewish people? The belief can be metaphorical. Everyone is entitled to a belief in God as a spiritual matter, but making God into a property manager who disburses lands to a select group is bizarre and not a friendly gesture. Strange that Mr. Omnipotent allowed other peoples to occupy the same property – rent free. Has anyone else heard this decree, other than the beneficiaries who may, yes may have fabricated it? My personal attitude – I’d like to see a written contract.
Now that they are the “Chosen People,” they can set the borders where they wish to reside. In Deuteronomy 7:6-8, the fifth book of the Torah, Moses clarifies their Lord’s directives to the Zionists.
And I will set your border from the Red Sea to the Sea of the Philistines, and from the wilderness to the Euphrates, for I will give the inhabitants of the land into your hand, and you shall drive them out before you.
“Drive them out before you,” and because Joshua’s genocide of the local inhabitants of the Levant was incomplete, the 20th century Zionists attempted to complete the task. They seized the Sinai Peninsula in their 1956 war and arranged a secret meeting, in which they asked France and Great Britain to give permission for them to extend Israel to the Litani River in Lebanon.
Rarely mentioned is a controversial meeting, known as the Protocol of Sèvres,1956, and reported in “Anatomy of a War Plot,” Avi, Shlaim. International Affairs, volume 73, 1997, pp. 509-530, which describes Israel Prime Minister David ben Gurion’s proposed plan to Great Britain and France. Although the meeting records are not available in French and British government archives, the meeting occurrence and parts of ben Gurion’s plan are confirmed in Shimon Peres: the biography by Michael Bar-Zohar.
The session started at 4 p.m. on Monday, 22 October, in the conservatory of the villa and it was intended to enable the leaders of the two countries to get to know each other and to have a preliminary discussion. Ben-Gurion opened the discussion by listing his military, political and moral considerations against ‘the English plan’. His main objection was that Israel would be branded as the aggressor while Britain and France would pose as peace-makers but he was also exceedingly apprehensive about exposing Israeli cities to attack by the Egyptian Air Force. Instead he presented a comprehensive plan, which he himself called ‘fantastic’, for the reorganization of the Middle East. Jordan, he observed, was not viable as an independent state and should therefore be divided. Iraq would get the East Bank in return for a promise to settle the Palestinian refugees there and to make peace with Israel while the West Bank would be attached to Israel as a semi-autonomous region. Lebanon suffered from having a large Muslim population which was concentrated in the south. The problem could be solved by Israel’s expansion up to the Litani River, thereby helping to turn Lebanon into a more compact Christian state. The Suez Canal area should be given an international status while the Straits of Tiran in the Gulf of Aqaba should come under Israeli control to ensure freedom of navigation. A prior condition for realizing this plan was the elimination of Nasser and the replacement of his regime with a pro-Western government which would also be prepared to make peace with Israel.
After President Dwight Eisenhower forced France and Great Britain to retreat from their partial occupation of Egypt, the Zionist proposed trip to the Litani River got interrupted. They retained the Sinai until the 1979 Camp David agreement, trading captured Egyptian territory for recognition of captured Palestinian lands.
Joshua’s task was partially extended when Jews arrived in Babylonia, and is celebrated during the feat of Purim. Considered a biblical story, the drama might have some historical validity. From the Book of Esther, 9:1-17,
On the 13th of Adar that year, the Jews throughout the Persian Empire mobilized and killed the enemies who had wanted to kill them. Esther asked the king’s permission for the Jews in Shushan to have one more day to destroy their enemy—and the king acceded to her wish. On that day, the 14th of Adar, the Jews worldwide celebrated, and the Jews of Shushan killed more of their enemies (75,000 people across the empire), and also hung Haman’s sons. The Jews of Shushan then rested and celebrated on the 15th of Adar.
After biblical history we arrive at modern history, which has foundations and might not always be correct. Two thousand years ago, there were no press services and surviving original sources are scarce.
During a limited time, of about 110 years, the Hasmonean Jews governed Palestine. This occurred during the 2nd century B.C., after the Maccabees wrested power from the Seleucid Empire. Not entirely reliable historian Flavius Josephus relates that Hasmonean leader John Hyrcanus used this period to expand territory in a less than usually violent manner. Hycranus “forced the Idumaeans to convert to Judaism. Those who wished to keep their land were required to undergo circumcision and adopt Jewish laws, transforming them into ‘entire Jews.’” This forced conversion allowed the absorption of Idumaean territory into the small and growing Judaic Empire. The greed and over-extension steered the corrupt Hasmoneon dynasty into a civil war. Before Roman troops reached Jerusalem in 70 A.D, Jews were murdering each other and setting the stage for a deadly famine. From Josephus Chronicles:
And now, as the city was engaged in a war on all sides, from these treacherous crowds of wicked men; the people of the city between them were, like a great body, torn in pieces. The aged men, and the women were in such distress by their internal calamities, that they wished for the Romans; and earnestly hoped for an external war, in order to their delivery from their domestical miseries.
The next time Jewish tribes rebelled was 50 years later, in the little mentioned and most important, Kitos War, which happened in several locations simultaneously. One original source is Roman historian, Cessious Dios, Epitome of Book 68, P.431, who may have originated and exaggerated the atrocities. Jew, Greeks, and Romans contested the lands and there were atrocities on all side.
Meanwhile the Jews in the region of Cyrene had put a certain Andreas at their head, and were destroying both the Romans and the Greeks. They would eat the flesh of their victims, make belts for themselves of their entrails, anoint themselves with their blood and wear their skins for clothing; many they sawed in two, from the head downwards; others they gave to wild beasts, and still others they forced to fight as gladiators. In all two hundred and twenty thousand persons perished. In Egypt, too, they perpetrated many similar outrages, and in Cyprus, under the leadership of a certain Artemion. There, also, two hundred and forty thousand perished, and for this reason no Jew may set foot on that island, but even if one of them is driven upon its shores by a storm he is put to death.
Lucius Quietus, governor of Judea Quietus for whom the war and land was named, destroyed Jewish existence in several locations. In Alexandria, Turbo, with the assistance of the local Greeks, massacred the Jewish community.
A major migration of Jews to Yemen began at the beginning of the 2nd century A.D. In the 4th–5th centuries, people in Yemen (Himyarites) converted to Judaism and established a Jewish-ruled kingdom. Dhū Nuwās, the last prominent Jewish king in Yemen, reigned from approximately 517 to 525 A.D. Maybe it was the times, but he committed crimes against Christians, which few people know. If it was the other way, crimes against Jews, even after 2000 years, we would be daily reminded of them.
Having heard of the persecutions of the Jews by the Byzantine emperors, Dhū Nuwās retaliated by putting to death Byzantine merchants who were traveling on business through Himyara. This destroyed the trade of Yemen with Europe and involved Dhu Nuwas in a war with the heathen king Aidug, whose commercial interests were injured thereby. Dhu Nuwas was defeated (521), but succeeded in reestablishing his kingdom. Soon, however, he entangled himself in a new difficulty. He made war against the Christian city Najran, in Yemen, which was a dependency of his kingdom; and on its capitulation, in spite, it is said, of his promise of immunity from punishment, he offered the citizens the alternative of embracing Judaism or being put to death. As they refused to renounce their faith, he executed their chief, Ḥarith ibn Kaleb, and three hundred and forty chosen men.
The last time that a Jewish authority existed happened with the conversion of a Khazar king. Not entirely verified, but accepted by historians, is the conversion of Turkic people who established a powerful empire in the region between the Black and Caspian Seas during the early medieval period; these were the Khazars who converted to Judaism in the 9th century under King Bulan. A strange episode has been used to verify the conversions.
In the sixteenth century, Isaac Abraham Akrish, a collector and publisher of books, discovered correspondence between Hasdai Ibn Shaprut, minister at the court of Abdulrahman III, caliph of Cordova, and Joseph, king of the Khazars. The correspondence verified that the kingdom of the Khazars had converted to Judaism. Supposedly, Judaism flourished within Khazaria with prominent synagogues and educational institutions. To their credit, the Khazar kingdoms tolerated all religions. The document authenticity has been challenged.
Ancient Israel was home to ancient Jews. The area that is now Israel was not the ancient home of modern Jews. When an ethnicity speaks of an ancient home, it speaks similar to the voices of Native Americans, of caring for the land or for their hunting grounds, for attachment to a soil that nourished them, and with intimate knowledge of ancestors. They may look back at a recognized civilization that gave the world new advances in technology, culture, warfare, administration, or other disciplines, and left identifiable physical traces that excite mankind. Modern Jews have no relation to the soil, no memories of an advanced civilization, no honest attachment to an ancient land, and do not have intimate knowledge of ancestors.
Historical evidence shows that, after the ancient Hebrews, due to conquest and subjugation, faded from history, many of the later Jews were not attached to the land and did not consider it a national home ─ just the opposite ─ a large number of the later Jews preferred to remain in Babylonia. Jews moved throughout the Roman Empire, populating Alexandria, Rome, Cyrenaica, Salonika, Cyprus, and other places. From the time of the Maccabean revolt of the mid-2nd century B.C. to the Bar Kokhba revolt of the 2nd century A.D., some of whose centuries included the reign of the Hasmoneans, a sizable Jewish exodus to Mesopotamia and Persia and throughout the Roman Empire occurred. Freed from a pastoral life, dry conditions, and restricted economies, new communities of Mesopotamian Jews, knowledgeable and worldly, appeared in the Fertile Crescent. That region, which housed the great Jewish academies of Surah, Pumbadita, and Nehardea, best expressed the legacy and heritage of modern Judaism. In The Chosen Few: How Education Shaped Jewish History, 70-1492, winner of the 2012 National Jewish Book Award in Scholarship, by Maristella Botticini, Zvi Eckstein, Princeton University press, 2012, the authors claim that “Judaism reached its Golden Age in 800 -1200 A.D. During that time, Mesopotamia and Persia contained 75% of world Jewry with the rest in North Africa and Western Europe.”
Jews who scattered throughout the world have only one connection ─ the scriptures. This has proved to be a powerful connection; words that proclaim a “chosen people,” a special people, distinct from the rest of mankind, deserving to live in their own “promised land.” Words that excite, invigorate, and allow to violate. Zionism has become an atavistic revival of the ancient Hebrews, guided by third century B.C. literature, a manuscript written to unite an unsettled people by giving them a fabricated and powerful history. Formulation of the Torah formed Judaism in the third century B.C. There were Jews before 200 B.C.; there was no Judaism before 200 B. C. Before there was a Torah read by the masses, there could not be a Judaism.
A constant drumming of public relations and historical misconceptions have made it seem as if the more than two thousand years of lack of control and sizable physical presence by Jews in the Levant did not occur. Today is portrayed as only a short interval from the 2700-year-old reign of ancient King Hezekiah. Centuries of Christian and Crusader rule and more than one thousand years of Muslim rule and their tremendous constructions and creations in Jerusalem are downplayed. The Christian and Muslim everything become nothing, and a minor Hebrew something becomes everything. Myth replaces reality. Ethereal spirituality replaces physical presence. Myths have been portrayed as reality and that portrayal is incorrect.
Gone are the Zionist pioneers, struggling in Kibbutzim against nature to reclaim a land. On stage are Zionist settlers, struggling to evict Palestinians and steal their land. Halting the catastrophe has a prerequisite ─ halting the spread of documents that shape the mind that commits the genocide.